Business & policy

Apple’s chatgpt deal faces legal friction as siri turns to gemini

At a glance:

  • OpenAI is consulting lawyers about possible breach‑of‑contract action against Apple over the ChatGPT integration
  • Apple has confirmed it is testing Google’s Gemini models in Siri and Apple Intelligence while also eyeing Anthropic
  • Both sides reportedly still prefer a settlement, but the dispute highlights how limited the ChatGPT rollout has been on iOS

What happened

OpenAI is reportedly weighing legal options against Apple after the tech giant’s integration of ChatGPT into Siri, Writing Tools, Visual Intelligence and Image Playground fell short of the expectations set when the partnership was announced in early 2024. Bloomberg cites unnamed OpenAI lawyers who are working with an external firm to draft a notice that could allege breach of contract. No final decision has been made, and the report stresses that OpenAI would still rather resolve the issue out of court.

The friction stems from OpenAI’s belief that Apple has not made a “honest effort” to promote or deeply embed ChatGPT across its ecosystem. An unnamed OpenAI executive is quoted as saying, “We have done everything from a product perspective. They have not, and worse, they haven’t even made an honest effort.” The executive’s frustration reflects internal studies that show Apple users are far more likely to download the standalone ChatGPT app than to rely on the built‑in Siri shortcut.

Why the partnership underperformed

When the deal was first announced, both companies expected a quick win: Apple would give ChatGPT a prominent spot in Siri and the broader Apple Intelligence suite, while OpenAI hoped the massive iPhone user base would translate into a surge of paid subscriptions. In practice, the integration has been described as “limited, hard to find, and under‑promoted.” Users must explicitly invoke Siri with a request like “Ask ChatGPT,” and the responses generated inside Apple’s UI are more constrained than those from the native OpenAI app.

Analysts note that the lack of deep integration also means Apple cannot surface ChatGPT in contexts where users naturally turn to AI, such as predictive text or image generation within native apps. This contrasts sharply with Google’s approach, where Gemini models are being woven into the core of Android and Google Workspace, giving the competition a strategic advantage.

Apple’s pivot to gemini and other AI partners

Amid the growing dissatisfaction, Apple has confirmed it is working with Google to power Siri and Apple Intelligence with Gemini models. The move signals a broader AI strategy that includes exploring a partnership with Anthropic, the creator of Claude. Apple executives have emphasized that the Gemini rollout is not intended to replace ChatGPT outright, but to diversify the AI toolkit available to iOS users.

OpenAI, however, maintains that the Apple deal was never meant to be exclusive, and the presence of other models does not, in its view, constitute a breach. Still, the timing is awkward: Apple’s AI ambitions have already been marred by a $250 million settlement over alleged false advertising of Apple Intelligence capabilities, and delayed Siri features have eroded consumer confidence.

Potential outcomes and industry impact

If OpenAI proceeds with a formal breach‑of‑contract notice, the dispute could end up in a courtroom where the precise terms of the 2024 agreement will be scrutinized. A settlement might involve Apple offering more prominent placement for ChatGPT, revenue‑sharing adjustments, or a joint roadmap for future AI features. Conversely, a protracted legal battle could push Apple to accelerate its Gemini integration and further distance its voice assistant from OpenAI’s technology.

Industry watchers see this clash as a bellwether for how big‑tech firms will manage AI partnerships moving forward. The rapid pace of model development means that today’s “strategic alliance” can quickly become a liability if expectations are not met. For developers and enterprise customers, the outcome may influence which AI APIs are prioritized on mobile platforms in the next 12‑18 months.

What to watch next

  • Apple’s next iOS update – Look for deeper Gemini features or a refreshed Siri UI that explicitly mentions the new model.
  • OpenAI’s public statements – Any press release or filing could hint at the legal strategy or a possible settlement.
  • Regulatory scrutiny – Both the U.S. FTC and EU competition bodies have shown interest in AI‑related contracts, and a high‑profile dispute could attract additional oversight.
  • User adoption metrics – Analysts will monitor ChatGPT app downloads versus Siri‑based usage to gauge whether Apple’s AI pivot is resonating with consumers.

The saga underscores that AI partnerships are no longer just technical experiments; they are high‑stakes commercial agreements where execution, marketing and contractual clarity are as critical as the underlying model performance.

Editorial SiliconFeed is an automated feed: facts are checked against sources; copy is normalized and lightly edited for readers.

FAQ

What legal steps is OpenAI considering against Apple?
OpenAI is working with an external law firm to draft a breach‑of‑contract notice that could be sent to Apple. The notice would allege that Apple failed to make a genuine effort to promote and deeply integrate ChatGPT across its software, contrary to expectations set in the 2024 partnership.
How is Apple responding to the underperformance of ChatGPT on iOS?
Apple has confirmed it is testing Google’s Gemini models in Siri and Apple Intelligence and is also exploring a partnership with Anthropic. The company says the Gemini rollout is meant to diversify its AI offerings, not to replace ChatGPT, and it remains open to resolving the dispute without litigation.
Why are Apple users more likely to use the standalone ChatGPT app than Siri’s built‑in version?
Internal studies cited by Bloomberg indicate that the built‑in ChatGPT integration requires users to explicitly ask Siri for the service, and the responses are more limited compared to the full ChatGPT app. This extra friction, combined with lower visibility in Apple’s UI, leads to higher adoption of the standalone app.

More in the feed

Prepared by the editorial stack from public data and external sources.

Original article